0.11/0.12 % Problem : theBenchmark.p : TPTP v0.0.0. Released v0.0.0. 0.12/0.15 % Command : eprover-ho %s --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --free-numbers -auto-schedule -p --cpu-limit=%d --neg-ext=all --pos-ext=all --ext-sup-max-depth=2 --schedule-kind=CASC 0.15/0.37 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu 0.15/0.37 % Model : x86_64 x86_64 0.15/0.37 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz 0.15/0.37 % Memory : 8042.1875MB 0.15/0.37 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64 0.15/0.37 % CPULimit : 1200 0.15/0.37 % WCLimit : 120 0.15/0.37 % DateTime : Tue Jul 13 11:38:03 EDT 2021 0.23/0.37 % CPUTime : 0.23/0.37 % Number of cores: 8 0.23/0.37 % Python version: Python 3.6.8 0.23/0.37 # Version: 2.6rc1-ho 0.23/0.39 # No SInE strategy applied 0.23/0.39 # Trying AutoSched0 for 59 seconds 12.69/12.85 # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic Y1006__C12_02_nc_F1_AE_CS_SP_S2S 12.69/12.85 # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP. 12.69/12.85 # 12.69/12.85 # Preprocessing time : 0.077 s 12.69/12.85 # Presaturation interreduction done 12.69/12.85 12.69/12.85 # Proof found! 12.69/12.85 # SZS status Theorem 12.69/12.85 # SZS output start CNFRefutation 12.69/12.85 thf(fact_3_sortLemmaL, axiom, ![X21:a > int, X51:binary1439146945Tree_a, X52:a, X53:binary1439146945Tree_a]:(binary1721989714Tree_a @ X21 @ (binary717961607le_T_a @ X51 @ X52 @ X53)=>binary1721989714Tree_a @ X21 @ X51), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_3_sortLemmaL)). 12.69/12.85 thf(fact_1_s, axiom, binary1721989714Tree_a @ h @ (binary717961607le_T_a @ t1 @ x @ t2), file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', fact_1_s)). 12.69/12.85 thf(conj_0, conjecture, binary1721989714Tree_a @ h @ t1, file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p', conj_0)). 12.69/12.85 thf(c_0_3, plain, ![X140:a, X139:binary1439146945Tree_a, X53:binary1439146945Tree_a]:(esk1_3 @ X53 @ X139 @ X140)=(binary717961607le_T_a @ X139 @ X140 @ X53), introduced(definition)). 12.69/12.85 thf(c_0_4, plain, ![X1855:a > int, X1856:binary1439146945Tree_a, X1857:a, X1858:binary1439146945Tree_a]:(~binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1855 @ (binary717961607le_T_a @ X1856 @ X1857 @ X1858)|binary1721989714Tree_a @ X1855 @ X1856), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[inference(fof_nnf,[status(thm)],[fact_3_sortLemmaL])])). 12.69/12.85 thf(c_0_5, plain, ![X2913:a, X2914:binary1439146945Tree_a, X2915:binary1439146945Tree_a]:(esk1_3 @ X2915 @ X2914 @ X2913)=(binary717961607le_T_a @ X2914 @ X2913 @ X2915), inference(variable_rename,[status(thm)],[c_0_3])). 12.69/12.85 thf(c_0_6, plain, ![X5:a, X21:a > int, X24:binary1439146945Tree_a, X51:binary1439146945Tree_a]:(binary1721989714Tree_a @ X21 @ X24|~binary1721989714Tree_a @ X21 @ (binary717961607le_T_a @ X24 @ X5 @ X51)), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_4])). 12.69/12.85 thf(c_0_7, plain, ![X5:a, X51:binary1439146945Tree_a, X24:binary1439146945Tree_a]:(esk1_3 @ X24 @ X51 @ X5)=(binary717961607le_T_a @ X51 @ X5 @ X24), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_5])). 12.69/12.85 thf(c_0_8, plain, binary1721989714Tree_a @ h @ (binary717961607le_T_a @ t1 @ x @ t2), inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[fact_1_s])). 12.69/12.85 thf(c_0_9, negated_conjecture, ~binary1721989714Tree_a @ h @ t1, inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[inference(assume_negation,[status(cth)],[conj_0])])). 12.69/12.85 thf(c_0_10, plain, ![X51:binary1439146945Tree_a, X24:binary1439146945Tree_a, X21:a > int, X5:a]:(binary1721989714Tree_a @ X21 @ X24|~binary1721989714Tree_a @ X21 @ (esk1_3 @ X51 @ X24 @ X5)), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6, c_0_7])). 12.69/12.85 thf(c_0_11, plain, binary1721989714Tree_a @ h @ (esk1_3 @ t2 @ t1 @ x), inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8, c_0_7])). 12.69/12.85 thf(c_0_12, negated_conjecture, ~binary1721989714Tree_a @ h @ t1, inference(split_conjunct,[status(thm)],[c_0_9])). 12.69/12.85 thf(c_0_13, plain, ($false), inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10, c_0_11]), c_0_12]), ['proof']). 12.69/12.85 # SZS output end CNFRefutation 12.69/12.85 # Proof object total steps : 14 12.69/12.85 # Proof object clause steps : 7 12.69/12.85 # Proof object formula steps : 7 12.69/12.85 # Proof object conjectures : 3 12.69/12.85 # Proof object clause conjectures : 1 12.69/12.85 # Proof object formula conjectures : 2 12.69/12.85 # Proof object initial clauses used : 4 12.69/12.85 # Proof object initial formulas used : 3 12.69/12.85 # Proof object generating inferences : 1 12.69/12.85 # Proof object simplifying inferences : 3 12.69/12.85 # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative 12.69/12.85 # Parsed axioms : 390 12.69/12.85 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0 12.69/12.85 # Initial clauses : 696 12.69/12.85 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 69 12.69/12.85 # Initial clauses in saturation : 627 12.69/12.85 # Processed clauses : 2315 12.69/12.85 # ...of these trivial : 11 12.69/12.85 # ...subsumed : 596 12.69/12.85 # ...remaining for further processing : 1708 12.69/12.85 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 141 12.69/12.85 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0 12.69/12.85 # Backward-subsumed : 63 12.69/12.85 # Backward-rewritten : 134 12.69/12.85 # Generated clauses : 28476 12.69/12.85 # ...of the previous two non-trivial : 6281 12.69/12.85 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 10 12.69/12.85 # Paramodulations : 4426 12.69/12.85 # Factorizations : 26 12.69/12.85 # NegExts : 153 12.69/12.85 # Equation resolutions : 180 12.69/12.85 # Propositional unsat checks : 0 12.69/12.85 # Propositional check models : 0 12.69/12.85 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0 12.69/12.85 # Propositional clauses : 0 12.69/12.85 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0 12.69/12.85 # Propositional unsat core size : 0 12.69/12.85 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000 12.69/12.85 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000 12.69/12.85 # Propositional solver time : 0.000 12.69/12.85 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000 12.69/12.85 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000 12.69/12.85 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000 12.69/12.85 # Current number of processed clauses : 858 12.69/12.85 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 84 12.69/12.85 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0 12.69/12.85 # Negative unit clauses : 52 12.69/12.85 # Non-unit-clauses : 722 12.69/12.85 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 4878 12.69/12.85 # ...number of literals in the above : 60600 12.69/12.85 # Current number of archived formulas : 0 12.69/12.85 # Current number of archived clauses : 786 12.69/12.85 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 3768344 12.69/12.85 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 214408 12.69/12.85 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 494 12.69/12.85 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 18781 12.69/12.85 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0 12.69/12.85 # BW rewrite match attempts : 96 12.69/12.85 # BW rewrite match successes : 12 12.69/12.85 # Condensation attempts : 0 12.69/12.85 # Condensation successes : 0 12.69/12.85 # Termbank termtop insertions : 8346536 12.69/12.85 12.69/12.85 # ------------------------------------------------- 12.69/12.85 # User time : 12.436 s 12.69/12.85 # System time : 0.028 s 12.69/12.85 # Total time : 12.464 s 12.69/12.85 # Maximum resident set size: 2616 pages 12.69/12.85 EOF